MOJ Header

Current Issue - July 2017, Volume 11, Issue No. 2

Official Journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association

A Comparison of Plain Radiography with Computer Tomography in Determining Coronal and Sagittal Alignments following Total Knee Arthroplasty


  1. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(5): 709-14.
  2. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park D. The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2014; 38(2): 379-85.
  3. Lustig S, Scholes CJ, Stegeman TJ, Oussedik S, Coolican MRJ, Parker DA. Sagittal placement of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty predicts knee flexion contracture at one-year follow-up. Int Orthop. 2012; 36(9): 1835-9.
  4. Babazadeh S, Dowsey MM, Bingham RJ, Ek ET, Stoney JD, Choong PFM. The long leg radiograph is a reliable method of assessing alignment when compared to computer-assisted navigation and computer tomography. Knee. 2013; 20(4): 242-9.
  5. Rauh MA, Boyle J, Mihalko WM, Phillips MJ, Bayers-Thering M, Krackow KA. Reliability of measuring long-standing lower extremity radiographs. Orthopedics. 2007; 30(4): 299-303.
  6. Specogna AV, Birmingham TB, DaSilva JJ, Milner JS, Kerr J, Hunt MA, et al. Reliability of lower limb frontal plane alignment measurements using plain radiographs and digitized images. J Knee Surg. 2004; 17(4): 203-10.
  7. Schmidt GL, Altman GT, Dougherty JT, DeMeo PJ. Reproducibility and reliability of the anatomic axis of the lower extremity. J Knee Surg. 2004; 17(3): 141-3.
  8. Sabharwal S, Zhao C. Assessment of lower limb alignment: supine fluoroscopy compared with a standing full-length radiograph. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(1): 43-51.
  9. Brouwer RW, Jakma TSC, Brouwer KH, Verhaar JAN. Pitfalls in determining knee alignment: a radiographic cadaver study. J Knee Surg. 2007; 20(3): 210-5.
  10. Petersen TL, Engh GA. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1988; 3(1): 67-72.
  11. Henckel J, Richards R, Lozhkin K, Harris S, Rodriguez y Baena FM, Barrett ARW, et al. Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement. The imperial knee protocol. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(11): 1513-8.
  12. Hinterwimmer S, Graichen H, Vogl TJ, Abolmaali N. An MRI-based technique for assessment of lower extremity deformitiesreproducibility, accuracy, and clinical application. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(7): 1497-505.
  13. Pitto RP, Graydon AJ, Bradley L, Malak SF, Walker CG, Anderson IA. Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system for total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(5): 601–5.
  14. Yaffe MA, Koo SS, Stulberg SD. Radiographic and Navigation Measurements of TKA Limb Alignment Do Not Correlate. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(11): 2736-44.
  15. Li G, Papannagari R, Most E, Park SE, Johnson T, Tanamal L, et al. Anterior tibial post impingement in a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2005; 23(3): 536-41.
  16. Stoller AP, Johnson TS, Popoola OO, Humphrey SM, Blanchard CR. Highly crosslinked polyethylene in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: in vitro performance evaluation of wear, delamination, and tibial post durability. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 26(3): 483-91.
  17. Radtke K, Becher C, Noll Y, Ostermeier S. Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010; 130(4): 451-7.
  18. Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA. Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (331): 102-6.
  19. Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM. Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(6): 818-23.
  20. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA). Flying and Health - Cosmic Radiation Exposure for Casual Flyers and Aircrew. Accessed 22 Nov 2016
  21. Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EY. Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; (255): 215-27.
  22. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; (248): 9-12.
  23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476): 307-10.
  24. Prakash U, Wigderowitz CA, McGurty DW, Rowley DI. Computerised measurement of tibiofemoral alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83(6): 819-24.
  25. Buford WL, Turnbow BJ, Gugala Z, Lindsey RW. Three-dimensional computed tomography-based modeling of sagittal cadaveric femoral bowing and implications for intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(1): 10-6.
  26. Chung BJ, Kang YG, Chang CB, Kim SJ, Kim TK. Differences between sagittal femoral mechanical and distal reference axes should be considered in navigated TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(9): 2403-13.
  27. Tsukeoka T, Lee TH, Tsuneizumi Y, Suzuki M. The tibial crest as a practical useful landmark in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2014; 21(1): 283-9.
  28. Han HS, Chang CB, Seong SC, Lee S, Lee MC. Evaluation of anatomic references for tibial sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008; 16(4): 373-7.
  29. Bragdon CR, Martell JM, Estok DM, Greene ME, Malchau H, Harris WH. A new approach for the Martell 3-D method of measuring polyethylene wear without requiring the cross-table lateral films. J Orthop Res. 2005; 23(4): 720-5.
  30. Jazrawi LM, Birdzell L, Kummer FJ, Di Cesare PE. The accuracy of computed tomography for determining femoral and tibial total knee arthroplasty component rotation. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15(6): 761-6.

Abstract   |   Reference

MOJ footer

About Us

The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that is published three times a year in both print and electronic online version. The purpose of this journal is to publish original research studies, evaluation of current practices and case reports in various subspecialties of orthopaedics and traumatology, as well as associated fields like basic science, biomedical engineering, rehabilitation medicine and nursing.

Keep in Touch

creative-commons License