Current Issue - May 2009, Volume 3, Issue No. 1

1. Weinstein SL. Idiopathic scoliosis: natural history. Spine 1986;11: 780-3.
2. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, Homel P, Merola AA, Grogan DP, et al. Results of the scoliosis research society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent isiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999; 24: 1435-40.
3. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC. Further development and validation of the scoliosis research society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine 2000; 25: 2381-86.
4. King HA, Moe JH, David SB, Winter RB. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1983; 65: 1302-13.
5. Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Kamath G, Peelle MW, Bridwell KH. Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of hooks versus pedicle screws. Spine 2006; 31: 2400-4.
6. Suk S, Lee CK, Kim W, Chung Y, Park Y. Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1995; 20: 1399-405.
7. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J, Bridwell KH, Cho SK, Cheh G, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006; 31: 291-8.
8. Crawford JR, Izatt MT, Adam CJ, Labrom RD, Askin GN. A prospective assessment of SRS-24 scores after endoscopic anterior instrumentation for scoliosis. Spine 2006; 31: E817-22.
9. Newton PO, Parent S, Marks M, Pawelek J. Prospective evaluation of 50 consecutive scoliosis patients surgically treated with thoracoscopic anterior instrumentation. Spine 2005; 30: S100-9.
10. Merola AA, Haher TR, Brkaric M, Panagopoulos G, Mathur S, Kohani O, et al. A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the scoliosis research society (SRS) outcome instrument. Spine 2002; 27: 2046-51.
11. Sweet FA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke KM, Whorton J. Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications of single solid rod instrumented anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001; 26: 1956-65.
12. Watanabe K, Hasegawa K, Hirano T, Uchiyama S, Endo N. Evaluation of postoperative residual spinal deformity and patient outcome in idiopathic scoliosis patients in japan using the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument. Spine 2007; 32: 550-54.
13. White SF, Asher MA, Lai SM, Burtom DC. Patients’ perceptions of overall function, pain, and appearance after primary instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999; 24: 1693-700.
14. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, Manna B. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003; 28: 63-9.
15. Berven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S, Hu SS, Bradford DS. Studies in the modified scoliosis research society outcomes instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discrimination capacity. Spine 2003; 28: 2164-9.
16. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton DC, Manna BJ. Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 2003; 28: 74-7.
17. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, Manna B. Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 2003; 28: 70-3.
18. Lai SM, Asher M, Burton D. Estimating srs-22 quality of life measures with SF-36. Application in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006; 31: 473-8.
19. Bago J, Climent J, Ey A, Perez-Grueso FJ, Izquierdo E. The Spanish version of the srs-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis: transcultural adaptation and reliability analysis. Spine 2004; 29: 1676-80.
20. Alanay A, Cil A, Berk H, Acaroglu RE, Yazici M, Akcali O, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish version of scoliosis research society-22 (srs-22) questionnaire. Spine 2005; 30: 2464-8.

Abstract   |   Reference