MOJ Header

Current Issue - November 2009, Volume 3, Issue No. 2

Official Journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association

Early Functional Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty

References

  1. Rankin EA, Alarcon GS, Chang RW, Cooney LM, Costley LS, Delitto A, et al. NIH consensus statement on total knee replacement December 8-10, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86: 1328-35.
  2. CDC. Public health and aging: Projected prevalence of self reported arthritis or chronic joint symptoms among persons aged 65 years in United States, 2005-2030. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2003; 52(21): 489-91.
  3. Callahan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA, Dittus RS. Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. A meta analysis. JAMA, 1994; 271(17): 1349-57.
  4. Blasser KE, Bourne RB, Evans JP. Genesis II Total knee system: Primary surgical technique. [Brochures by Smith and Nephews]
  5. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott NW. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1989; 248: 13-4.
  6. Kane RL, Saleh KJ, Wilt TJ, Bershadsky B. The functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005; 87: 1719-24.
  7. Alicea J, Churchill SN. Scoring systems and their validation for the arthritic knee in surgery of the knee. 3rd ed. New York: Livingston; 2001: 1507-15.
  8. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol, 1988; 15(12): 1833-40.
  9. Ip D, Wu WC, Tsang WL: Early results of posterior-stabilised NexGen Legacy total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2003: 11(1): 38-42.
  10. Wright RJ, Sledge CB, Poss R, Ewald FC, Walsh ME, Lingard EA: Patient reported outcome and survivorship after Kinemax Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004; 86: 2464-70.
  11. Klein GR, Restrepo C, Hozack WJ. The effect of knee component design changes on range of motion evaluation in vivo by a computerised navigation system. J Arthroplasty, 2006; 21(5): 623-7.

Abstract   |   Reference

MOJ footer

About Us

The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that is published three times a year in both print and electronic online version. The purpose of this journal is to publish original research studies, evaluation of current practices and case reports in various subspecialties of orthopaedics and traumatology, as well as associated fields like basic science, biomedical engineering, rehabilitation medicine and nursing.

Keep in Touch

creative-commons License