Current Issue - July 2012, Volume 6, Issue No. 2

1. Insall JN, Windsor R, Scott W, Kelly M, Aglietti P. Surgery of the knee, 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone, London 1993.
2. Hoppenfeld S, deBoer P. Surgical exposures in orthopaedics: the anatomic approach. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1994:430-4.
3. Dixon MC, Brown RR, Parsch D, Scott RD. Modular fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament. A study of patients followed for a minimum of fifteen years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:598-603.
4. Keating EM, Meding JB, Faris PM, Ritter MA. Long-term follow-up of nonmodular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; 404: 34-9.
5. Kelly MA, Clarke HD. Long-term results of posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404: 51-7.
6. Silva M, Shepherd EF, Jackson WO, Pratt JA, McClung CD, Schmalzried TP. Knee strength after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18: 605-11.
7. Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Stevens JE, Vandenborne K, Snyder-Mackler L. Early quadriceps strength loss after total knee arthroplasty. The contributions of muscle atrophy and failure of voluntary muscle activation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 1047-53.
8. Rand JA. The patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994; 76: 612-20.
9. Matsueda M, Gustilo RB. Subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2000; 161.
10. Roysam GS, Oakley MJ. The Subvastus Approach for Total Knee Arthroplasty Resulted in Better Short-Term Outcomes than Did the Parapatellar Approach. A prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16: 454-7.
11. Sastre S, Sanchez MD, Lozano L, Orient F, Fontg F, Nun˜ez M. Total knee arthroplasty: better short-term results after subvastus Approach. A Randomized, controlled study Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17: 1184-8.
12. Chang CH, Chen KH, Yang RS, Liu TK. Muscle torques in total knee arthroplasty with subvastus and parapatellar approaches. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; 98: 189-95.
13. Dalury DF, Jiranek WA. A comparison of the midvastus and paramedian approaches for total kneearthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 33-7.
14. White RE, Allman JK, Trauger JA, et al. Clinical comparison of the midvastus and medial parapatellar surgical approaches. Clin Orthop. 1999; 367: 117-22.
15. Engh GA, Holt BT, Parks NL. A midvastus muscle splitting approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 322.
16. Berth A, Urbach D, Neumann W, Awiszus F. Strength and voluntary activation of quadriceps femoris muscle in total knee arthroplasty with midvastus and subvastus approach. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 83-8.
17. Chang CH, Yang RS, Chen KH, Liu TK, Chen WC, Ho YC et al. Muscle torque in total knee arthroplasty: comparison of subvastus and midvastus approaches. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18: 934-8.
18. Callaghan M, Babu V, Ellis D, Samarji R. Electromyographic comparison of the mid-vastus and sub-vastus approaches to total knee arthroplasty. Curr Orthop Pract. 2009; 20: 442-7.
19. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957; 16: 494.
20. Hofmann AA, Plaster RL, Murdock LE Subvastus. (Southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991; 269: 70-7.
21. Kelly MJ, Rumi MN, Kothari M, Parentis MA, Bailey KJ, Parrish WM et al. Comparison of the Vastus-Splitting and MedianParapatellar Approaches for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty:A Prospective, Randomized Study. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89 (S2):80-92.
22. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of The Knee Society Clinical Rating System. Clin Orthop. 1989; 248: 13-4.
23. Ewald FC. The Knee Society Total Knee Arthroplasty RoentgenographicEvaluation and Scoring System. Clin Orthop. 1989; 248:9-12.
24. Cila E, Guzel V, Ozalay M et al. Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002; 122: 65-8.
25. Maestro A, Suarez MA, Rodriguez L, Guerra C, Murcia A. The midvastus surgical approach in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2000; 24: 104-7.
26. Weinrauch P, Myers N, Wilkinson M, Dodsworth J, Fitzpatrick P, Whitehouse S. Comparison of early postoperative rehabilitation outcome following total knee arthroplasty using different surgical approaches and instrumentation. J Orthop Surg. 2006;14:47-52.
27. Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB, Ritter MA. Comparison of the midvastus muscles plitting approach with the median parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1999; 14: 29-32.

Abstract   |   Reference