Current Issue - July 2017, Volume 11, Issue No. 2

1. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(5): 709-14.
2. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park D. The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2014; 38(2): 379-85.
3. Lustig S, Scholes CJ, Stegeman TJ, Oussedik S, Coolican MRJ, Parker DA. Sagittal placement of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty predicts knee flexion contracture at one-year follow-up. Int Orthop. 2012; 36(9): 1835-9.
4. Babazadeh S, Dowsey MM, Bingham RJ, Ek ET, Stoney JD, Choong PFM. The long leg radiograph is a reliable method of assessing alignment when compared to computer-assisted navigation and computer tomography. Knee. 2013; 20(4): 242-9.
5. Rauh MA, Boyle J, Mihalko WM, Phillips MJ, Bayers-Thering M, Krackow KA. Reliability of measuring long-standing lower extremity radiographs. Orthopedics. 2007; 30(4): 299-303.
6. Specogna AV, Birmingham TB, DaSilva JJ, Milner JS, Kerr J, Hunt MA, et al. Reliability of lower limb frontal plane alignment measurements using plain radiographs and digitized images. J Knee Surg. 2004; 17(4): 203-10.
7. Schmidt GL, Altman GT, Dougherty JT, DeMeo PJ. Reproducibility and reliability of the anatomic axis of the lower extremity. J Knee Surg. 2004; 17(3): 141-3.
8. Sabharwal S, Zhao C. Assessment of lower limb alignment: supine fluoroscopy compared with a standing full-length radiograph. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(1): 43-51.
9. Brouwer RW, Jakma TSC, Brouwer KH, Verhaar JAN. Pitfalls in determining knee alignment: a radiographic cadaver study. J Knee Surg. 2007; 20(3): 210-5.
10. Petersen TL, Engh GA. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1988; 3(1): 67-72.
11. Henckel J, Richards R, Lozhkin K, Harris S, Rodriguez y Baena FM, Barrett ARW, et al. Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement. The imperial knee protocol. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(11): 1513-8.
12. Hinterwimmer S, Graichen H, Vogl TJ, Abolmaali N. An MRI-based technique for assessment of lower extremity deformitiesreproducibility, accuracy, and clinical application. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(7): 1497-505.
13. Pitto RP, Graydon AJ, Bradley L, Malak SF, Walker CG, Anderson IA. Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system for total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(5): 601–5.
14. Yaffe MA, Koo SS, Stulberg SD. Radiographic and Navigation Measurements of TKA Limb Alignment Do Not Correlate. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(11): 2736-44.
15. Li G, Papannagari R, Most E, Park SE, Johnson T, Tanamal L, et al. Anterior tibial post impingement in a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2005; 23(3): 536-41.
16. Stoller AP, Johnson TS, Popoola OO, Humphrey SM, Blanchard CR. Highly crosslinked polyethylene in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: in vitro performance evaluation of wear, delamination, and tibial post durability. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 26(3): 483-91.
17. Radtke K, Becher C, Noll Y, Ostermeier S. Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010; 130(4): 451-7.
18. Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA. Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (331): 102-6.
19. Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM. Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(6): 818-23.
20. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA). Flying and Health - Cosmic Radiation Exposure for Casual Flyers and Aircrew. http://wwww.arpansa.gov.au/factsheets/FlyingandHealth.pdf. Accessed 22 Nov 2016
21. Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EY. Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; (255): 215-27.
22. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; (248): 9-12.
23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476): 307-10.
24. Prakash U, Wigderowitz CA, McGurty DW, Rowley DI. Computerised measurement of tibiofemoral alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83(6): 819-24.
25. Buford WL, Turnbow BJ, Gugala Z, Lindsey RW. Three-dimensional computed tomography-based modeling of sagittal cadaveric femoral bowing and implications for intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(1): 10-6.
26. Chung BJ, Kang YG, Chang CB, Kim SJ, Kim TK. Differences between sagittal femoral mechanical and distal reference axes should be considered in navigated TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(9): 2403-13.
27. Tsukeoka T, Lee TH, Tsuneizumi Y, Suzuki M. The tibial crest as a practical useful landmark in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2014; 21(1): 283-9.
28. Han HS, Chang CB, Seong SC, Lee S, Lee MC. Evaluation of anatomic references for tibial sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008; 16(4): 373-7.
29. Bragdon CR, Martell JM, Estok DM, Greene ME, Malchau H, Harris WH. A new approach for the Martell 3-D method of measuring polyethylene wear without requiring the cross-table lateral films. J Orthop Res. 2005; 23(4): 720-5.
30. Jazrawi LM, Birdzell L, Kummer FJ, Di Cesare PE. The accuracy of computed tomography for determining femoral and tibial total knee arthroplasty component rotation. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15(6): 761-6.

Abstract   |   Reference