Current Issue - March 2019, Volume 13, Issue No. 1

1. Illes T, Tunyogi-Csapo M, Somoskeoy S. Breakthrough in three-dimensional scoliosis diagnosis: significance of horizontal plane view and vertebra vectors. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20(1): 135-43.
2. Lowe TG, Edgar M, Margulies JY, Miller NH, Raso VJ, Reinker KA, et al. Etiology of idiopathic scoliosis: current trends in research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(8): 1157-68.
3. Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, Chung YJ, Park YB. Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20(12): 1399-405.
4. Maruyama T, Takeshita K. Surgical treatment of scoliosis: a review of techniques currently applied. Scoliosis. 2008; 3: 6.
5. Cidambi KR, Glaser DA, Bastrom TP, Nunn TN, Ono T, Newton PO. Postoperative changes in spinal rod contour in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an in vivo deformation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37(18): 1566-72.
6. Luk KD, Lu DS, Wong YW. A prospective comparison of the coronal deformity correction in thoracic scoliosis using four different instrumentations and the fulcrum-bending radiograph. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(5): 560-3.
7. Brooks HL, Azen SP, Gerberg E, Brooks R, Chan L. Scoliosis: A prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975; 57(7): 968-72.
8. Soucacos PN, Zacharis K, Gelalis J, Soultanis K, Kalos N, Beris A, et al.Assessment of curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 1998; 7(4): 270-7.
9. Rose PS, Lenke LG. Classification of operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment guidelines. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007; 38(4): 521-9.
10. Binyamin G, Shafi BM, Mery CM. Biomaterials: a primer for surgeons. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2006; 15(4): 276-83.
11. Miller A, Islam K, Grannum S, Morris S, Hutchinson J, Nelson I. Cobalt chromium versus titanium alloy: has the change in scoliosis implant material improved deformity correction? Orthopaedic Proceedings. 2014; 96(Supp 6): 20.
12. Abul-Kasim K, Karlsson MK, Ohlin A. Increased rod stiffness improves the degree of deformity correction by segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2011; 6: 13.
13. Johnston CE II, Ashman RB, Baird AM, Allard RN. Effect of spinal construct stiffness on early fusion mass incorporation. experimental study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990; 15(9): 908-12.
14. Salmingo RA, Tadano S, Abe Y, Ito M. Influence of implant rod curvature on sagittal correction of scoliosis deformity. Spine J. 2014; 14(8): 1432-9.
15. Abe Y, Ito M, Abumi K, Sudo H, Salmingo R, Tadano S. Scoliosis corrective force estimation from the implanted rod deformation using 3D-FEM analysis. Scoliosis. 2015; 10(Suppl 2): S2.
16. Liu H, Li Z, Li S, Zhang K, Yang H, Wang J, et al. Main thoracic curve adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: association of higher rod stiffness and concave-side pedicle screw density with improvement in sagittal thoracic kyphosis restoration. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015; 22(3): 259-66.
17. Okada E, Watanabe K, Hosogane N, Shiono Y, Takahashi Y, Nishiwaki Y, et al. Comparison of stainless steel and titanium alloy instruments in posterior correction and fusion surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis-prospective cohort study with minimum 2-year follow-up. J Med Biol Eng. 2013; 33(3): 325-9.
18. Di Silvestre M, Lolli F, Bakaloudis G, Maredi E, Vommaro F, Pastorelli F. Apical vertebral derotation in the posterior treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: myth or reality? Eur Spine J. 2013; 22(2): 313-23.
19. Hwang SW, Samdani AF, Gressot LV, Hubler K, Marks MC, Bastrom TP, et al. Effect of direct vertebral body derotation on the sagittal profile in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2012; 21(1): 31-9.

Abstract   |   Reference