MOJ Header

Current Issue - November 2020, Volume 14, Issue No. 3

Official Journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association

Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection is not Inferior to Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

References

  1. Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86(5): 963-74. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200405000-00012
  2. Laupacis A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, Feeny D, Wong C, Tugwell P, et al. The effect of elective total hip replacement on healthrelated quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75(11): 1619-26. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199311000-00006
  3. Lim JB, Chou AC, Yeo W, Lo NN, Chia SL, Chin PL, et al. Comparison of patient quality of life scores and satisfaction after common orthopedic surgical interventions. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015; 25(6): 1007-12.
  4. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(7): 1487-97. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02441
  5. Biring GS, Masri BA, Greidanus NV, Duncan CP, Garbuz DS. Predictors of quality of life outcomes after revision total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89(11): 1446-51. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B11.19617
  6. Robinson AH, Palmer CR, Villar RN. Is revision as good as primary hip replacement? A comparison of quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999; 81(1): 42-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b1.8728
  7. Davis AM, Agnidis Z, Badley E, Kiss A, Waddell JP, Gross AE. Predictors of functional outcome two years following revision hip arthroplasy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(4): 685-91. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00150
  8. Saleh KJ, Celebrezze M, Kassim R, Dykes DC, Gioe TJ, Callaghan JJ, et al. Functional outcome after revision hip arthroplasty: a metaanalysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (416): 254-64. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000093006.90435.43
  9. Mahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN, Phillips CB, Losina E, Lew RA, et al. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(1): 27-32. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00005
  10. Mahomed N, Katz JN. Revision total hip arthroplasty. Indications and outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 1996; 39(12): 1939-50. doi: 10.1002/art.1780391202
  11. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(1): 128-33. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00155
  12. Younger AS, Duncan CP, Masri BA, McGraw RW. The outcome of two-stage arthroplasty using a custom-made interval spacer to treat the infected hip. J Arthroplasty. 1997; 12(6): 615-23. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90133-9
  13. Durbhakula SM, Czajka J, Fuchs MD, Uhl RL. Spacer endoprosthesis for the treatment of infected total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(6): 760-67. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.037
  14. Etienne G, Waldman B, Rajadhyaksha AD, Ragland PS, Mont MA. Use of a functional temporary prosthesis in a two stage approach to infection at the site of a total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(Suppl 4): 94-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200300004-00011
  15. Magnan B, Regis D, Biscaglia R, Bartolozzi P. Preformed acrylic bone cement spacer loaded with antibiotics: use of two stage procedure in 10 patients because of infected hips after total replacement. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001; 72(6): 591-4. doi: 10.1080/000164701317269003
  16. Romano CL, Romano D, Logoluso N, Meani E. Septic versus aseptic hip revision: how different? J Orthop Traumatol. 2010; 11(3): 167-74. doi: 10.1007/s10195-010-0106-y
  17. Barrack RL, Engh G, Rorabeck C, Sawhney J, Woolfrey M. Patient satisfaction and outcome after septic versus aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15(8): 990-3. doi: 10.1054/arth.2000.16504
  18. Wang CJ, Hsieh MC, Huang TW, Wang JW, Chen HS, Liu CY. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction in aseptic and septic revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2004; 11(1): 45-9. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0160(02)00094-7
  19. Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Bennett D, Delanois RE, Saleh KJ, Thongtrangan I, et al. Total hip arthroplasties: What are the reasons for revision? Int Orthop. 2008; 32(5): 597-604. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0364-3
  20. Crawford SA, Siney PD, Wroblewski BM. Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty with a proximal femoral modular cemented stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82(5): 684-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b5.10685
  21. Templeton JE, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Jonhston RC. Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83(11): 1706-11. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200111000-00014
  22. Lind M, Krarup N, Mikkelsen S, Horlyck E. Exchange impaction allografting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty: results in 87 cases after 3.6 years’ follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17(2): 158-64. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.29391
  23. Weeden SH, Paprosky WG. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17(4 Suppl 1): 134-7. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.32461
  24. Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, Namba R, Fithian D. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 447: 19-23. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218752.22613.78
  25. Taggart T, Kerry RM, Norman P, Stockley I. The use of Vancomycin-impregnated cement beads in the management of infection of prosthetic joints. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(1): 70-2. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b1.11948
  26. Fulkerson E, Valle CJ, Wise B, Walsh M, Preston C, Di Cesare PE. Antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria infecting total joint arthroplasty sites. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(6): 1231-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00004
  27. Hsieh PH, Shih CH, Chang YH, Lee MS, Shih HN, Yang WE. Two-stage revision hip arthroplasty for infection: Comparison between the interim use of antibiotic-loaded cement beads and a spacer prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86(9): 1989-97.
  28. Meek RM, Dunlop D, Garbuz DS, McGraw R, Greidanus NV, Masri BA. Patient satisfaction and functional status after aseptic versus septic revision total knee arthroplasty using the PROSTALAC articulating spacer. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(7): 874-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.06.028
  29. Patil S, Lee K, Huddleston JI, Harris AH, Goodman SB. Aseptic versus septic revision total knee arthroplasty: patient satisfaction, outcome and quality of life improvement. Knee. 2010; 17(3): 200-3. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2009.09.001
  30. Bozic KJ, Ries MD. The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(8): 1746-51. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02937
  31. Hebert CK, Williams RE, Levy RS, Barrack RL. Cost of treating an infected total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (331): 140-5. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199610000-00019
  32. Abu-Amer Y, Darwech I, Clohisy JC. Aseptic loosening of total joint replacements: mechanisms underlying osteolysis and potential therapies. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007; 9(Suppl 1): S6. doi: 10.1186/ar2170
  33. Lenguerrand E, Whitehouse MR, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom AW. Pain and Function Recovery Trajectories following Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Short-Term Changes and Comparison with Primary Hip Arthroplasty in the ADAPT Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2016; 11(10): e0164839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164839

Abstract   |   Reference

MOJ footer

About Us

The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that is published three times a year in both print and electronic online version. The purpose of this journal is to publish original research studies, evaluation of current practices and case reports in various subspecialties of orthopaedics and traumatology, as well as associated fields like basic science, biomedical engineering, rehabilitation medicine and nursing.

Keep in Touch

creative-commons License