MOJ Header

Current Issue - November 2022, Volume 16, Issue No. 3

Official Journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association

Thigh Pain and Peri-Implant Fractures with the Use of Short Cephalo-medullary Nails: A Retrospective Study of 122 Patients

References

  1. Chlebeck JD, Birch CE, Blankstein M, Kristiansen T, Bartlett CS, Schottel PC. Nonoperative Geriatric Hip Fracture Treatment Is Associated With Increased Mortality: A Matched Cohort Study. J Orthop Trauma. 2019; 33(7): 346-50. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001460
  2. Forni C, Gazineo D, D'Alessandro F, Fiorani A, Morri M, Sabattini T, et al. Predictive factors for thirty day mortality in geriatric patients with hip fractures: a prospective study. Int Orthop. 2019; 43(2): 275-81. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4057-x
  3. Parmar DS, Porecha MM, Chudasama SL. Long proximal femoral nails versus short proximal femoral nails for the management of proximal femoral fractures: a retrospective study of 124 patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2011; 21: 159-64. doi: 10.1007/s00590-010-0683-8
  4. Kleweno C, Morgan J, Redshaw J, Harris M, Rodriguez E, Zurakowski D, et al. Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(7): 391-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000036
  5. Vaughn J, Cohen E, Vopat BG, Kane P, Abbood E, Born C. Complications of short versus long cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric femur fractures, minimum 1 year follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015; 25(4): 665-70. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1557-2
  6. Shannon SF, Yuan BJ, Cross WW 3rd, Barlow JD, Torchia ME, Holte PK, et al. Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails for Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Randomized Prospective Study. J Orthop Trauma. 2019; 33(10): 480-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001553
  7. Boone C, Carlberg KN, Koueiter DM, Baker KC, Sadowski J, Wiater PJ, et al. Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2). J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(5): e96-100. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182a7131c
  8. Ozkan K, Unay K, Demircay C, Cakir M, Eceviz E. Distal unlocked proximal femoral intramedullary nailing for intertrochanteric femur fractures. Int Orthop. 2009; 33(5): 1397-400. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0673-1
  9. Ciaffa V, Vicenti G, Mori CM, Panella A, Conserva V, Corina G, et al. Unlocked versus dynamic and static distal locked femoral nails in stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures. A prospective study. Injury. 2018; 49 (Suppl 3): S19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.063
  10. Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2018; 32 (Suppl 1): S1-S170. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063
  11. Kumar P, Sen R, Aggarwal S, Agarwal S, Rajnish RK. Reliability of Modified Harris Hip Score as a tool for outcome evaluation of Total Hip Replacements in Indian population. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019; 10(1): 128-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.11.019
  12. Dodenhoff RM, Dainton JN, Hutchins PM. Proximal thigh pain after femoral nailing. Causes and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997; 79(5): 738-41. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b5.7345
  13. Pu JS, Liu L, Wang GL, Fang Y, Yang TF. Results of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in elderly Chinese patients. Int Orthop. 2009; 33(5): 1441-4. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0776-3
  14. Rosen M, Kasik C, Swords M. Management of Lateral Thigh Pain following Cephalomedullary Nail: A Technical Note. Spartan Med Res J. 2020; 5(1): 12931. doi: 10.51894/001c.12931
  15. Parker MJ, Cawley S. Short (175 mm) versus standard (220 mm) length intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures: a randomized trial of 229 patients. Bone Joint J. 2020; 102-B(3): 394-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-0776.R3
  16. Dubey S, Iyer RD, Azam MQ, Sarkar B. Customised proximal femoral nail in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture with ipsilateral femoral shaft malunion: A case report. Trauma Case Rep. 2020; 29: 100348. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2020.100348
  17. Muller F, Galler M, Zellner M, Bauml C, Marzouk A, Fuchtmeier B. Peri-implant femoral fractures: The risk is more than three times higher within PFN compared with DHS. Injury. 2016; 47(10): 2189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.042
  18. Robinson CM, Adams CI, Craig M, Doward W, Clarke MC, Auld J. Implant-related fractures of the femur following hip fracture surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(7): 1116-22. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200207000-00004

Abstract   |   Reference

MOJ footer

About Us

The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that is published three times a year in both print and electronic online version. The purpose of this journal is to publish original research studies, evaluation of current practices and case reports in various subspecialties of orthopaedics and traumatology, as well as associated fields like basic science, biomedical engineering, rehabilitation medicine and nursing.

Keep in Touch

creative-commons License