MOJ Header

Current Issue - November 2023, Volume 17, Issue No. 3

Official Journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association

Dynamic Fixation versus Static Screw Fixation for Syndesmosis Injuries in Pronation External Rotation Ankle Fractures: A Retrospective Case Control Study


  1. Jensen SL, Andresen BK, Mencke S, Nielsen PT. Epidemiology of ankle fractures. A prospective population-based study of 212 cases in Aalborg, Denmark. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998; 69(1): 48-50. doi: 10.3109/17453679809002356
  2. Dattani R, Patnaik S, Kantak A, Srikanth B, Selvan TP. Injuries to the tibiofibular syndesmosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(4): 405-10. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.19750
  3. Ræder BW, Figved W, Madsen JE, Frihagen F, Jacobsen SB, Andersen MR. Better outcome for suture button compared with single syndesmotic screw for syndesmosis injury: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial. Bone Joint J. 2020; 102-B(2): 212-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0692.R2
  4. Lloyd J, Elsayed S, Hariharan K, Tanaka H. Revisiting the concept of talar shift in ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27(10): 793-6. doi: 10.1177/107110070602701006
  5. Taser F, Shafiq Q, Ebraheim NA. Three-dimensional volume rendering of tibiofibular joint space and quantitative analysis of change in volume due to tibiofibular syndesmosis diastases. Skeletal Radiol. 2006; 35(12): 935-41. doi: 10.1007/s00256-006-0101-9
  6. Kim JH, Gwak HC, Lee CR, Choo HJ, Kim JG, Kim DY. A Comparison of Screw Fixation and Suture-Button Fixation in a Syndesmosis Injury in an Ankle Fracture. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016; 55(5): 985-90. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.05.002
  7. Schepers T. Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair. Int Orthop. 2012; 36(6): 1199-206. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1500-2
  8. Bava E, Charlton T, Thordarson D. Ankle fracture syndesmosis fixation and management: the current practice of orthopedic surgeons. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010; 39(5): 242-6.
  9. Coetzee JC, Ebeling PB. Treatment of syndesmoses disruptions: A prospective, randomized study camparing conventional screw fixation vs TightRope® fiber wire fixation - medium term results. SA Orthop J. 2009: 8(1): 32-7.
  10. Gardner MJ, Demetrakopoulos D, Briggs SM, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27(10): 788-92. doi: 10.1177/107110070602701005
  11. Shaheen E. What is the effective technique for syndesmotic stabilization tight rope or screw? Ortho & Rheum Open Access J. 2018; 13(3): 555862. doi: 10.19080/OROAJ.2018.13.555862
  12. Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Philbin TM, Berlet GC. Transosseous fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: comparison of an interosseous suture and endobutton to traditional screw fixation in 50 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009; 48(6): 620-30. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2009.07.013
  13. Degroot H, Al-Omari AA, El Ghazaly SA. Outcomes of suture button repair of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32(3): 250-6. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0250
  14. Laflamme M, Belzile EL, Bédard L, van den Bekerom MP, Glazebrook M, Pelet S. A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated surgically with a static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture. J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29(5): 216-23. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000245
  15. Xu G, Chen W, Zhang Q, Wang J, Su Y, Zhang Y. Flexible fixation of syndesmotic diastasis using the assembled bolt-tightrope system. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013; 21: 71. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-71
  16. Thornes B, Shannon F, Guiney AM, Hession P, Masterson E. Suture-button syndesmosis fixation: accelerated rehabilitation and improved outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (431): 207-12.
  17. Willmott HJ, Singh B, David LA. Outcome and complications of treatment of ankle diastasis with tightrope fixation. Injury. 2009; 40(11): 1204-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.05.008
  18. Lehtola R, Leskelä HV, Flinkkilä T, Pakarinen H, Niinimäki J, Savola O, et al. Suture button versus syndesmosis screw fixation in pronation-external rotation ankle fractures: A minimum 6-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Injury. 2021; 52(10): 3143-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.06.025
  19. Zhang P, Liang Y, He J, Fang Y, Chen P, Wang J. A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 18(1): 286. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1645-7
  20. van den Bekerom MP, Hogervorst M, Bolhuis HW, van Dijk CN. Operative aspects of the syndesmotic screw: review of current concepts. Injury. 2008; 39(4): 491-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.11.425
  21. Naqvi GA, Cunningham P, Lynch B, Galvin R, Awan N. Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(12): 2828-35. doi: 10.1177/0363546512461480
  22. Rigby RB, Cottom JM. Does the Arthrex TightRope® provide maintenance of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis? A 2-year follow-up of 64 TightRopes® in 37 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013; 52(5): 563-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.04.013
  23. Pakarinen HJ, Flinkkilä TE, Ohtonen PP, Hyvönen PH, Lakovaara MT, Leppilahti JI, et al. Syndesmotic fixation in supination-external rotation ankle fractures: a prospective randomized study. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32(12): 1103-9. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.1103
  24. Lehtola R, Leskelä HV, Flinkkilä TE, Pakarinen HJ, Niinimäki JL, Ohtonen PP, et al. Syndesmosis fixation in supination-external rotation ankle fractures. Long-Term results of a prospective randomised study. Foot Ankle Surg. 2022; 28(2): 229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.03.014
  25. Inge SY, Pull Ter Gunne AF, Aarts CAM, Bemelman M. A systematic review on dynamic versus static distal tibiofibular fixation. Injury. 2016; 47(12): 2627-34. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.032
  26. Storey P, Gadd RJ, Blundell C, Davies MB. Complications of suture button ankle syndesmosis stabilization with modifications of surgical technique. Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 33(9): 717-21. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0717
  27. Schepers T, Van Lieshout EM, de Vries MR, Van der Elst M. Complications of syndesmotic screw removal. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32(11): 1040-4. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.1040
  28. McMurray D, Hornung B, Venkateswaran Z. Walking on a tightrope: our experience in the treatment of traumatic ankle syndesmosis rupture. Injury Extra. 2008; 39: 182.

Abstract   |   Reference

MOJ footer

About Us

The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that is published three times a year in both print and electronic online version. The purpose of this journal is to publish original research studies, evaluation of current practices and case reports in various subspecialties of orthopaedics and traumatology, as well as associated fields like basic science, biomedical engineering, rehabilitation medicine and nursing.

Keep in Touch

creative-commons License