Current Issue - March 2024, Volume 18, Issue No. 1

1. Ates M, Kinaci E, Kose E, Soyer V, Sarici B, Cuglan S, et al. Corona mortis: in vivo anatomical knowledge and the risk of injury in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2016; 20(5): 659-65. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1444-8
2. Rusu MC, Cergan R, Motoc AG, Folescu R, Pop E. Anatomical considerations on the corona mortis. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010; 32(1): 17-24. doi: 10.1007/s00276-009-0534-7
3. Al Talalwah W. A new concept and classification of corona mortis and its clinical significance. Chin J Traumatol. 2016; 19(5): 251-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.06.004
4. Stavropoulou-Deli A, Anagnostopoulou S. Corona mortis: anatomical data and clinical considerations. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013; 53(3): 283-6. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12076
5. Rahim EA, Hussin P, Mawardi M, Halim AHA, Suppiah S, Hassan HA, et al. Incidence of crown of death (corona mortis) in 132 multiracial asian hemipelves using 128 dual energy CT scan. Nippon Acta Radiol. 2014; 50: S172.
6. Aday LA, Cornelius LJ. Designing and Conducting Health Surveys: A Comprehensive Guide. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
7. Okcu G, Erkan S, Yercan HS, Ozic U. The incidence and location of corona mortis: a study on 75 cadavers. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004; 75(1): 53-5. doi: 10.1080/00016470410001708100
8. Hong HX, Pan ZJ, Chen X, Huang ZJ. An anatomical study of corona mortis and its clinical significance. Chin J Traumatol. 2004; 7(3): 165-9.
9. Pungpapong SU, Thum-umnauysuk S. Incidence of corona mortis; preperitoneal anatomy for laparoscopic hernia repair. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005; 88 Suppl 4: S51-3.
10. Namking M, Woraputtaporn W, Buranarugsa M, Kerdkoonchorn M. Corona mortis in Thai. FASEB J. 2006; 20(4). doi: 10.1096/fasebj.20.4.A445-c
11. Darmanis S, Lewis A, Mansoor A, Bircher M. Corona mortis: an anatomical study with clinical implications in approaches to the pelvis and acetabulum. Clin Anat. 2007; 20(4): 433-9. doi: 10.1002/ca.20390
12. Ruangwannasak S, Prachaney P, Kanla P, Mothong W. The prevalence of corona mortis in north-eastern thai fresh cadavers and the safety zone for herniorrhaphy. Srinagarind Med J. 2019; 34(3).
13. Karakurt L, Karaca I, Yilmaz E, Burma O, Serin E. Corona mortis: incidence and location. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002; 122(3): 163-4. doi: 10.1007/s004020100341
14. Lau H, Lee F. A prospective endoscopic study of retropubic vascular anatomy in 121 patients undergoing endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc. 2003; 17(9): 1376-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8800-y
15. Smith JC, Gregorius JC, Breazeale BH, Watkins GE. The corona mortis, a frequent vascular variant susceptible to blunt pelvic trauma: identification at routine multidetector CT. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009; 20(4): 455-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.01.007
16. Pellegrino A, Damiani GR, Marco S, Ciro S, Cofelice V, Rosati F. Corona mortis exposition during laparoscopic procedure for gynecological malignancies. Updates Surg. 2014; 66(1): 65-8. doi: 10.1007/s13304-013-0245-9
17. Kinaci E, Ates M, Dirican A, Ozgor D. Low pressure is necessary to view and to protect corona mortis during totally extraperitoneal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016; 26(12): 978-84. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0080

Abstract   |   Reference