Current Issue - July 2024, Volume 18, Issue No. 2

1. Dua K, Osterman AL, Abzug JM. Carpal tunnel syndrome: initial management and the treatment of recalcitrant patients. Instr Course Lect. 2017; 66:141-52.
2. Katz JN, Simmons BP. Clinical practice. Carpal tunnel syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(23): 1807-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp013018
3. Prime MS, Palmer J, Khan WS, Goddard NJ. Is there Light at the End of the Tunnel? Controversies in the Diagnosis and Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Hand (N Y). 2010; 5(4): 354-60. doi: 10.1007/s11552-010-9263-y
4. Gerritsen AA, de Vet HC, Scholten RJ, Bertelsmann FW, de Krom MC, Bouter LM. Splinting vs surgery in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002; 288(10): 1245-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.10.1245
5. Ly-Pen D, Andréu JL, Millán I, de Blas G, Sánchez-Olaso A. Comparison of surgical decompression and local steroid injection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: 2-year clinical results from a randomized trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012; 51(8): 1447-54. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes053
6. Niessen FB, Spauwen PH, Kon M. The role of suture material in hypertrophic scar formation: Monocryl vs. Vicryl-rapide. Ann Plast Surg. 1997; 39(3): 254-60. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199709000-00006
7. Gromov K, Troelsen A, Raaschou S, Sandhold H, Nielsen CS, Kehlet H, et al. Tissue Adhesive for Wound Closure Reduces Immediate Postoperative Wound Dressing Changes After Primary TKA: A Randomized Controlled Study in Simultaneous Bilateral TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019; 477(9): 2032-8. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000637
8. Khan RJ, Fick D, Yao F, Tang K, Hurworth M, Nivbrant B, et al. A comparison of three methods of wound closure following arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(2): 238-42. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B2.16923
9. El-Gazzar Y, Smith DC, Kim SJ, Hirsh DM, Blum Y, Cobelli M, et al. The use of dermabond® as an adjunct to wound closure after total knee arthroplasty: examining immediate post-operative wound drainage. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Apr;28(4):553-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.038
10. Livesey C, Wylde V, Descamps S, Estela CM, Bannister GC, Learmonth ID, et al. Skin closure after total hip replacement: a randomised controlled trial of skin adhesive versus surgical staples. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91(6): 725-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.21831
11. Bhende S, Rothenburger S, Spangler DJ, Dito M. In vitro assessment of microbial barrier properties of Dermabond topical skin adhesive. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2002; 3(3): 251-7. doi: 10.1089/109629602761624216
12. Pelissier P, Casoli V, Le Bail B, Martin D, Baudet J. Internal use of n-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate (Indermil) for wound closure: an experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 108(6): 1661-6. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200111000-00034
13. Braginsky L, Javellana M, Cleveland E, Elue R, Wang C, Boyle D, et al. Tissue Adhesive Compared With Sterile Strips After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 134(2): 295-301. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003367
14. Dumville JC, Coulthard P, Worthington HV, Riley P, Patel N, Darcey J, et al. Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 2014(11): CD004287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004287.pub4
15. Sinha S, Naik M, Wright V, Timmons J, Campbell AC. A single blind, prospective, randomized trial comparing n-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Indermil) and sutures for skin closure in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Br. 2001; 26(3): 264-5. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2000.0572
16. Guyuron B, Vaughan C. A comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials for skin repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992; 89(2): 234-6. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199202000-00005
17. Theopold C, Potter S, Dempsey M, O'Shaughnessy M. A randomised controlled trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after open carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012; 37(4): 350-3. doi: 10.1177/1753193411422334
18. Dosani A, Khan SK, Gray S, Joseph S, Whittaker IA. Clinical outcome and cost comparison of carpal tunnel wound closure with monocryl and ethilon: a prospective study. Hand Surg. 2013; 18(2): 189-92. doi: 10.1142/S0218810413500226
19. Al-Qattan MM. Vicryl Rapide versus Vicryl suture in skin closure of the hand in children: a randomized prospective study. J Hand Surg Br. 2005; 30(1): 90-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.08.005
20. Erel E, Pleasance PI, Ahmed O, Hart NB. Absorbable versus non-absorbable suture in carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Br. 2001; 26(2): 157-8. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2000.0545
21. Kharwadkar N, Naique S, Molitor PJ. Prospective randomized trial comparing absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in open carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Br. 2005; 30(1): 92-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.10.009
22. Kundra RK, Newman S, Saithna A, Lewis AC, Srinivasan S, Srinivasan K. Absorbable or non-absorbable sutures? A prospective, randomised evaluation of aesthetic outcomes in patients undergoing elective day-case hand and wrist surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010; 92(8): 665-7. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12699663905113
23. Messi G, Canciani G, Marchi AG. Costi e benefici dell'impiego di collante tissutale nelle ferite del bambino [Costs and benefits of the use of tissue adhesives in wounds in children]. Pediatr Med Chir. 1990; 12(2): 185-8. Italian.
24. Quinn JV, Osmond MH, Yurack JA, Moir PJ. N-2-butylcyanoacrylate: risk of bacterial contamination with an appraisal of its antimicrobial effects. J Emerg Med. 1995; 13(4): 581-5. doi: 10.1016/0736-4679(95)80025-5
25. Osmond MH, Klassen TP, Quinn JV. Economic comparison of a tissue adhesive and suturing in the repair of pediatric facial lacerations. J Pediatr. 1995; 126(6): 892-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70203-2

Abstract   |   Reference