MOJ Header

Current Issue - March 2025, Volume 19, Issue No. 1

Official Journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association

Addition of Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis in a Single stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Peroneus Longus Tendon: A Prospective Study

References

  1. Lien-Iversen T, Morgan DB, Jensen C, Risberg MA, Engebretsen L, Viberg B. Does surgery reduce knee osteoarthritis, meniscal injury and subsequent complications compared with non-surgery after ACL rupture with at least 10 years follow-up? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2020; 54(10): 592-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100765
  2. Grassi A, Kim C, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Zaffagnini S, Amendola A. What Is the Mid-term Failure Rate of Revision ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017; 475(10): 2484-99. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5379-5
  3. Ferretti A, Monaco E, Ponzo A, Basiglini L, Iorio R, Caperna L, et al. Combined Intra-articular and Extra-articular Reconstruction in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee: 25 Years Later. Arthroscopy. 2016; 32(10): 2039-47. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.02.006
  4. Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs K, Zurakowski D, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ. Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(9): 1560-72. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200209000-00008
  5. Magnussen RA, Reinke EK, Huston LJ; MOON Group; Hewett TE, Spindler KP. Effect of High-Grade Preoperative Knee Laxity on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44(12): 3077-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546516656835
  6. Sonnery-Cottet B, Thaunat M, Freychet B, Pupim BH, Murphy CG, Claes S. Outcome of a Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Technique With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43(7): 1598-605. doi: 10.1177/0363546515571571
  7. Getgood AMJ, Bryant DM, Litchfield R, Heard M, McCormack RG, Rezansoff A, et al. Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Reduces Failure of Hamstring Tendon Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 2-Year Outcomes From the STABILITY Study Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48(2): 285-97. doi: 10.1177/0363546519896333
  8. Claes S, Vereecke E, Maes M, Victor J, Verdonk P, Bellemans J. Anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. J Anat. 2013; 223(4): 321-8. doi: 10.1111/joa.12087
  9. Sonnery-Cottet B, Lutz C, Daggett M, Dalmay F, Freychet B, Niglis L, et al. The Involvement of the Anterolateral Ligament in Rotational Control of the Knee. Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44(5): 1209-14. doi: 10.1177/0363546515625282
  10. Devitt BM, Neri T, Fritsch BA. Combined anterolateral complex and anterior cruciate ligament injury: Anatomy, biomechanics, and management-State-of-the-art. J ISAKOS. 2023; 8(1): 37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.10.004
  11. Porter MD, Shadbolt B, Pomroy S. The Augmentation of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Modified Iliotibial Band Tenodesis to Correct the Pivot Shift: A Computer Navigation Study. Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46(4): 839-45. doi: 10.1177/0363546517750123
  12. Redler A, Iorio R, Monaco E, Puglia F, Wolf MR, Mazza D, et al. Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstrings and Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Mid- to Long-Term Clinical and Radiological Study. Arthroscopy. 2018; 34(12): 3204-13. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.05.045
  13. Alm L, Drenck TC, Frosch KH, Akoto R. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis in patients with revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and high-grade anterior knee instability. Knee. 2020; 27(5): 1451-7. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.06.005
  14. Eggeling L, Drenck TC, Frings J, Krause M, Korthaus A, Krukenberg A, et al. Additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis in revision ACL reconstruction does not influence the outcome of patients with low-grade anterior knee laxity. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022; 142(2): 291-9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04145-y
  15. Cantin O, Lustig S, Rongieras F, Saragaglia D, Lefèvre N, Graveleau N, et al. Outcome of cartilage at 12years of follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016; 102(7): 857-61. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.06.011
  16. Imbert P, Lustig S, Steltzlen C, Batailler C, Colombet P, Dalmay F, et al. Midterm results of combined intra- and extra-articular ACL reconstruction compared to historical ACL reconstruction data. Multicenter study of the French Arthroscopy Society. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017; 103(8S): S215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.09.005
  17. MOON Knee Group; Spindler KP, Huston LJ, Chagin KM, Kattan MW, Reinke EK, et al. Ten-Year Outcomes and Risk Factors After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46(4): 815-25. doi: 10.1177/0363546517749850
  18. Nitri M, Rasmussen MT, Williams BT, Moulton SG, Cruz RS, Dornan GJ, et al. An In Vitro Robotic Assessment of the Anterolateral Ligament, Part 2: Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Combined With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44(3): 593-601. doi: 10.1177/0363546515620183
  19. Williams A, Ball S, Stephen J, White N, Jones M, Amis A. The scientific rationale for lateral tenodesis augmentation of intra-articular ACL reconstruction using a modified 'Lemaire' procedure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25(4): 1339-44. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4537-3
  20. Park JG, Han SB, Lee CS, Jeon OH, Jang KM. Anatomy, Biomechanics, and Reconstruction of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee Joint. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(6): 786. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060786
  21. Mayr R, Sigloch M, Coppola C, Hoermann R, Iltchev A, Schmoelz W. Modified Lemaire tenodesis reduces anterior cruciate ligament graft forces during internal tibial torque loading. J Exp Orthop. 2022; 9(1): 45. doi: 10.1186/s40634-022-00484-w
  22. Inderhaug E, Stephen JM, Williams A, Amis AA. Biomechanical Comparison of Anterolateral Procedures Combined With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45(2): 347-54. doi: 10.1177/0363546516681555
  23. Rhatomy S, Asikin AIZ, Wardani AE, Rukmoyo T, Lumban-Gaol I, Budhiparama NC. Peroneus longus autograft can be recommended as a superior graft to hamstring tendon in single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27(11): 3552-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05455-w
  24. Agarwal A, Singh S, Singh A, Tewari P. Comparison of Functional Outcomes of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Using a Peroneus Longus Graft as an Alternative to the Hamstring Tendon Graft. Cureus. 2023; 15(4): e37273. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37273
  25. Shi FD, Hess DE, Zuo JZ, Liu SJ, Wang XC, Zhang Y, et al. Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft is a Safe and Effective Alternative for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2019; 32(8): 804-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669951
  26. Singh H, McKay M, Baldwin J, Nicholson L, Chan C, Burns J, et al. Beighton scores and cut-offs across the lifespan: cross-sectional study of an Australian population. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017; 56(11): 1857-64. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex043
  27. Risberg MA, Holm I, Steen H, Beynnon BD. Sensitivity to changes over time for the IKDC form, the Lysholm score, and the Cincinnati knee score. A prospective study of 120 ACL reconstructed patients with a 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999; 7(3): 152-9. doi: 10.1007/s001670050140
  28. Tegner Y, Lysholm J, Odensten M, Gillquist J. Evaluation of cruciate ligament injuries. A review. Acta Orthop Scand. 1988; 59(3): 336-41. doi: 10.3109/17453678809149379
  29. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF. Development and validation of health-related quality of life measures for the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (402): 95-109. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200209000-00009
  30. Collins NJ, Prinsen CA, Christensen R, Bartels EM, Terwee CB, Roos EM. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016; 24(8): 1317-29. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.03.010
  31. Ohnhaus EE, Adler R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1975; 1(4): 379-84. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90075-5
  32. Marx RG, Stump TJ, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29(2): 213-8. doi: 10.1177/03635465010290021601
  33. Van Lieshout EM, De Boer AS, Meuffels DE, Den Hoed PT, Van der Vlies CH, Tuinebreijer WE, et al. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score: a study protocol for the translation and validation of the Dutch language version. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(2): e012884. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012884
  34. Keizer MNJ, Brouwer RW, de Graaff F, Hoogeslag RAG. Higher return to pre-injury type of sports after revision anterior ligament reconstruction with lateral extra-articular tenodesis compared to without lateral extra-articular tenodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31(5): 1699-703. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07018-y
  35. Conte EJ, Hyatt AE, Gatt CJ Jr, Dhawan A. Hamstring autograft size can be predicted and is a potential risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure. Arthroscopy. 2014; 30(7): 882-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.03.028
  36. Mariscalco MW, Flanigan DC, Mitchell J, Pedroza AD, Jones MH, Andrish JT, et al. The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study. Arthroscopy. 2013; 29(12): 1948-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.08.025
  37. Hossain GMJ, Islam MS, Rahman Khan MM, Rafiqul Islam M, Rahman SMM, Jahan MS, et al. A prospective study of arthroscopic primary ACL reconstruction with ipsilateral peroneus longus tendon graft: Experience of 439 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(9): e32943. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032943
  38. Malige A, Baghdadi S, Hast MW, Schmidt EC, Shea KG, Ganley TJ. Biomechanical properties of common graft choices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2022; 95: 105636. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105636
  39. Keyhani S, Qoreishi M, Mousavi M, Ronaghi H, Soleymanha M. Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Study with a Mean Follow-up of Two Years. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022; 10(8): 695-701. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2022.59568.2938
  40. He J, Tang Q, Ernst S, Linde MA, Smolinski P, Wu S, et al. Peroneus longus tendon autograft has functional outcomes comparable to hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29(9): 2869-79. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06279-9
  41. Goyal T, Paul S, Choudhury AK, Sethy SS. Full-thickness peroneus longus tendon autograft for anterior cruciate reconstruction in multi-ligament injury and revision cases: outcomes and donor site morbidity. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023; 33(1): 21-7. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03145-3
  42. Zanna L, Niccolò G, Matteo I, Malone J, Roberto C, Fabrizio M. Clinical outcomes and return to sport after single-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by bone-patellar tendon autograft combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023; 33(5): 1811-9. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03352-6
  43. Alessio-Mazzola M, Formica M, Russo A, Sanguineti F, Capello AG, Lovisolo S, Felli L. Outcome after Combined Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision in Professional Soccer Players. J Knee Surg. 2019; 32(9): 906-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1672120

Abstract   |   Reference

MOJ footer

About Us

The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that is published three times a year in both print and electronic online version. The purpose of this journal is to publish original research studies, evaluation of current practices and case reports in various subspecialties of orthopaedics and traumatology, as well as associated fields like basic science, biomedical engineering, rehabilitation medicine and nursing.

Keep in Touch

creative-commons License