MOJ Header

Current Issue - March 2025, Volume 19, Issue No. 1

Official Journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association

A Prospective, Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the use of the Proximal Femoral Nail – Antirotation and Dynamic Hip Screw for Stable Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures-Stable Trochanteric Fractures Intramedullary versus Extramedullary (STRIVE) Study

References

  1. Pasco JA, Sanders KM, Hoekstra FM, Henry MJ, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA. The human cost of fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2005; 16(12): 2046-52. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-1997-y
  2. Jones HW, Johnston P, Parker M. Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hip screw? A meta-analysis of 24 studies involving 3,279 fractures. Int Orthop. 2006; 30(2): 69-78. doi: 10.1007/s00264-005-0028-0
  3. Saudan M, Lübbeke A, Sadowski C, Riand N, Stern R, Hoffmeyer P. Pertrochanteric fractures: is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail?: a randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail. J Orthop Trauma. 2002; 16(6): 386-93. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200207000-00004
  4. Zehir S, Zehir R, Zehir S, Azboy İ, Haykir N. Proximal femoral nail antirotation against dynamic hip screw for unstable trochanteric fractures; a prospective randomized comparison. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015; 41(4): 393-400. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0463-y
  5. Yu W, Zhang X, Zhu X, Yu Z, Xu Y, Zha G, et al. Proximal femoral nails anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screws for treatment of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: an outcome analyses with a minimum 4 years of follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17: 222. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1079-7
  6. Sharma A, Sethi A, Sharma S. Treatment of stable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur with proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw: a comparative study. Rev Bras Ortop. 2017; 53(4): 477-81. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.07.008
  7. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007; 21(10 Suppl): S1-133. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001
  8. Parker MJ, Palmer CR. A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993; 75(5): 797-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B5.8376443
  9. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969; 51(4): 737-55.
  10. Reindl R, Harvey EJ, Berry GK, Rahme E; Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (COTS). Intramedullary Versus Extramedullary Fixation for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97(23): 1905-12. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01007
  11. Li AB, Zhang WJ, Wang J, Guo WJ, Wang XH, Zhao YM. Intramedullary and extramedullary fixations for the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials. Int Orthop. 2017; 41(2): 403-13. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3308-y
  12. Nayak M, Yadav R, Ganesh V, Digge V. An unusual case of femoral head perforation following fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA-II) for an unstable intertrochanteric fracture: Case report and literature review. Trauma Case Rep. 2019; 20: 100178. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100178
  13. Yam M, Kang BJ, Chawla A, Zhang W, Way LG, Xavier RPA, et al. Cephalomedullary blade cut-ins: a poorly understood phenomenon. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020; 140(12): 1939-45. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03439-x
  14. Alvarez DB, Aparicio JP, Fernández EL, Múgica IG, Batalla DN, Jiménez JP. Implant breakage, a rare complication with the Gamma nail. A review of 843 fractures of the proximal femur treated with a Gamma nail. Acta Orthop Belg. 2004; 70(5): 435-43.
  15. Johnson NA, Uzoigwe C, Venkatesan M, Burgula V, Kulkarni A, Davison JN, et al. Risk factors for intramedullary nail breakage in proximal femoral fractures: a 10-year retrospective review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017; 99(2): 145-50. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0297
  16. Chua IT, Rajamoney GN, Kwek EB. Cephalomedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013; 21(3): 308-12. doi: 10.1177/230949901302100309
  17. Yu X, Wang H, Duan X, Liu M, Xiang Z. Intramedullary versus extramedullary internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fracture, a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018; 52(4): 299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.02.009
  18. Zhu Q, Xu X, Yang X, Chen X, Wang L, Liu C, et al. Intramedullary nails versus sliding hip screws for AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures in adults: A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017; 43: 67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.042
  19. Singh NK, Sharma V, Trikha V, Gamanagatti S, Roy A, Balawat AS, et al. Is PFNA-II a better implant for stable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly population ? A prospective randomized study. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019; 10(Suppl 1): S71-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 7. Erratum in: J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020; 11(6): 1169-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.09.032. Erratum in: J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021; 21: 101557. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101557
  20. Yeganeh A, Taghavi R, Moghtadaei M. Comparing the Intramedullary Nailing Method Versus Dynamic Hip Screw in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures. Med Arch. 2016; 70(1): 53-6. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2016.70.53-56
  21. Shen L, Zhang Y, Shen Y, Cui Z. Antirotation proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013; 99(4): 377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.019
  22. Swart E, Makhni EC, Macaulay W, Rosenwasser MP, Bozic KJ. Cost-effectiveness analysis of fixation options for intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(19): 1612-20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00603
  23. Casnovsky L, Blaschke BL, Parikh HR, Flagstad I, Wise K, McMilan LJ, et al. Does Implant Selection Affect the Inpatient Cost of Care for Geriatric Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures? Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2020; 11: 2151459320959005. doi: 10.1177/2151459320959005
  24. Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Michelsson O, Savolainen V, Hirvensalo E. Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a dynamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail. A randomised study comparing post-operative rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(1): 76-81.

Abstract   |   Reference

MOJ footer

About Us

The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that is published three times a year in both print and electronic online version. The purpose of this journal is to publish original research studies, evaluation of current practices and case reports in various subspecialties of orthopaedics and traumatology, as well as associated fields like basic science, biomedical engineering, rehabilitation medicine and nursing.

Keep in Touch

creative-commons License